Bug #8860 | Generic SQLColumns not supported? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Submitted: | 1 Mar 2005 11:52 | Modified: | 3 Jul 2007 19:10 |
Reporter: | Mark Junker | Email Updates: | |
Status: | Closed | Impact on me: | |
Category: | Connector / ODBC | Severity: | S3 (Non-critical) |
Version: | 3.51.11 | OS: | Windows (WinXP Pro SP2) |
Assigned to: | Jim Winstead | CPU Architecture: | Any |
[1 Mar 2005 11:52]
Mark Junker
[2 Nov 2005 19:57]
Yanfeng Chen
I concur. Although I'm not quite sure how exactly an ODBC driver should response to such a call, my application (Best Software MAS90 Visual Integrator) explicitly requires it when it tries to bring up a list of all tables/columns.
[12 Jun 2007 1:20]
Jim Winstead
boosting the prio. SQLColumns() handles its arguments really poorly. it does not handle the table name as a possible wildcard, and will totally choke on table names with any special characters. SQLColumns with all-null/empty arguments should give a list of all columns in all tables in the current database.
[12 Jun 2007 21:53]
Jim Winstead
Rewrite SQLColumns to fix various problems with handling input parameters
Attachment: bug8860.patch (text/plain), 27.33 KiB.
[15 Jun 2007 19:45]
Jim Winstead
The fix for this bug has been committed, and will be in the 3.51.17 release. Thanks for the bug report.
[3 Jul 2007 19:10]
Paul DuBois
Noted in 3.51.17 changelog. SQLColumns() did not handle many of its parameters correctly, which could lead to incorrect results. The table name argument was not handled as a pattern value, and most arguments were not escaped correctly when they contained non-alphanumeric characters.